Simon Piasecki's Performance of Fizz Bomb Essay

Simon Piaseckis Performance of Fizz misfire - Essay ExampleMoreover, the Fizz Bomb performance represents a series of video arts named Lessons in Language which was first aired at Shunt, London in June 2008 (Piasecki, 2008).We can divide provisionally the performance into two divulges. The first part arrestes in the moment of the explosion. The second begins when the fizzy drink has been made. There ar several concepts illustrated in the first part of Fizz Bomb. Let me start with the nomenclature and its references. As Fizz Bomb is part of the general idea of Lessons in Language it suggests that the performance seeks to convey the language barrier conception. We all have hear about the biblical city of Babel and its tower. The story narrates how population united by a common language decided to erect a tower with the intention that they will reach heaven and will be closer to God. God saw the construction of the power as a symbol of pride, as citizenry got more skilled and sh ared their ideas. He said that people become distanced from their creator and in cabaret to give them a lesson God confused their language, causing misunderstanding so that people were unable to finish the construction of the tower.Piasecki employed this biblical narration to show that the audience can not understand his Manchester Butchers suck up and presumably, they may misunderstand his int... Verbal comprehension is vital for the social communication and all early(a) varieties of conversations. The impossibleness to reach out and grasp other peoples thoughts leads to the destruction of merciful relations. This destruction is best depicted by the hidden facial expressions. Communication besides verbal can also be non-verbal. With hiding his casing throne a knitted mask Piasecki indicates that the miscommunication with his audience is absolute. He puts a boundary between himself and the viewer. The other concept expressed in the first part of Fizz Bomb is the consequences o f the misunderstanding. Piasecki does this through his garment. The clothes are combination of the kamikaze warrior bomb vest and the bullet-proven vest. Those two antipodes also symbolize the good and bad side of human nature. Once you might be the hunter and once you might be hunted. If you are misunderstood people can point you out as kamikaze. If you follow the rules, you are subject to attack by those who rebel, so you wear the bullet-proven vest. Simon Piasecki had a profound understanding about the current war conflicts and wanted to describe them in the minutest detail, in simple, clear way. My comprehension is that war conflicts are based on language barrier which creates opposition because people are unaware of the cultural, religious and verbal expression that other nations use. People hide behind stereotypes of kamikaze people and those who have to protect against them. The lack of zest to overcome this language boundary destroyed the staple fiber human attitude and co mmunication between different cultures. Once the bomb of Piasecki explodes there is only silence. The